Lamb, Meters. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict matchmaking (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Thought similarity and matchmaking profits certainly one of relationship people: An idiographic means
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). If the I am not saying scorching, could you be scorching or otherwise not?: Physical-appeal feedback and you will relationships choices just like the a purpose of one’s own elegance. Emotional Research, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other close matchmaking. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will in conflict matchmaking (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of aspiration. In the J. McV. Take a look (Ed.), Personality in addition to choices conditions (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting matchmaking matchmaking future with insiders’ and you may outsiders’ angle: Whom and what’s asked issues. Personal Dating, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will marital quality into the newly weds: A few founded strategy. Diary away from Identification and you may Personal Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A beneficial. (2006). Matchmaking. Washington, DC: Report into the Pew Internet & Western Existence Investment. Recovered , away from [ Website links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Evaluating the precision out of forecasts on the relationships relationship: How and exactly why would lovers’ predictions change from those individuals made by observers? Personality and you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Website links ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing factors from the initiation out-of heterosexual dating. Papers demonstrated on Earliest Globally Meeting to the Personal Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Merkle, Elizabeth.R., & Richardson, R.An effective. (2000). Electronic relationships and you may virtual appropriate: Conceptualizing computers mediated romantic dating. Friends, forty two, 187-192. [ Website links ]
Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Was actual resemblance very important to attraction? A beneficial meta-investigation out-of actual and you may detected similarity. Log of Social and personal Relationships, twenty five, 889-922. [ Links ]
Morry, Meters. Meters. (2005). Relationship fulfillment because the a predictor from resemblance product reviews; An examination of your own destination-similarity hypothesis. Log away from Personal and private Dating, twenty two, 561-584. [ Backlinks ]
Diary regarding Social and private Dating, 23, 865-880
Morry, Meters. Meters. (2007). The fresh new attraction-resemblance theory among get across-sex family relations: bästa grekiska datingsida Relationship satisfaction, thought of parallels, and care about-offering perceptions. Record regarding Personal and personal Relationships, 24, 117-138. [ Website links ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and you may extension of SVR principle off dyadic pairing. Journal from ily, forty two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will divorce case: An effective fourteen-year longitudinal examination of black colored couples and you will light partners. Record away from Societal and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]
Orenstein, S. (). The fresh love formula Match thinks it’s located a formula to possess governing the net relationship providers: A scientific way to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Correct. Team 2.0 Journal. Retrieved toward off [ Website links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Identification parallels for the couples. Identification and Individual Distinctions, 45, 533-535. [ Links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Partner needs: Exactly what properties do anyone desire within quick-label sexual and you will enough time-term romantic people? Record from Mindset and you may Individual Sexuality, several, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The latest role of your notice from the initiation and you will course of personal communication. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict matchmaking (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]